Communion, Doctrine and Practice

Communion, Doctrine and Practice

On Sunday morning we looked at the last meal Jesus ate with his friends and apprentices, the twelve men he intentionally invested three years of his life into so that they would move from being fishermen to the caretakers of the people’s souls and from wanting to make a nice life for themselves to those who would give up their lives so that justice, peace and the eternal lifefulness of heaven would come to all people on earth.  That may be the longest sentence I’ve ever written.

Anyway, as Ken was teaching about the meaning and mystery of Communion, he snuck in a comment that stuck with me, “We have turned this thing Jesus did to bring us together and made it into something that divides us.”  He’s right. All the theological debate – as important as it may be – about what Communion is or isn’t has, ironically, resulted in the opposite of what it was originally intended to produce.  This may be the most contentious thing I’ve yet said in one of my blogs: We Christ-followers have a strange way of continuing the practice of the Pharisees –of making strong statements about who’s right and who’s wrong; about who’s in and who’s out; about why we’re right and in and why others are wrong and out

I think these debates are the product of placing too much emphasis on doctrine and not enough emphasis on practice.  As you’ve read through Luke, where has Jesus put the emphasis – on right doctrine or right practice?  Is there a balance?  Is there a leaning in one direction over the other?   How do you see these two things (doctrine and practice) working together in the life of Christ?

Hopefully the above questions are enough to get you thinking.  I look forward to reading what you post.  My only request is that you season the truth with grace.

As always, if you have any great stories from DJ08 or the groups you’re a part of, post away!

5 comments (Add your own)

1. EB wrote:
Growing up, my memory of communion was that it was a solemn, and to a ten-year-old, even sad, time in the service. I remember looking around the darkened sanctuary (as inconspicuously as I could) to see what kids got the OK to take the teensy-tiny wafer and grape juice. While I was a little frightened to take communion (I didn't want to spill), being able to take it in my church was the mark of a "true believer," reserved for those who "really knew what they were doing," as it was explained to me. Then one day I saw my friend, Mike, a kid a year younger than I, (oh, and my boyfriend for two weeks in 5th grade) reach his hand into the silver plate and partake, and I thought, "What! He was cleared! You gotta be kidding." I was aghast and sure someone had been snookered. This kid just wanted juice in church...I really appreciated Ken's honesty yesterday when he confessed he really wasn't exactly sure what takes place (supernaturally or otherwise) when we take communion. I was relieved and thankful. I've been taking communion for a long time now and am still trying to sort out its significance and necessity for a follower of Jesus. I guess I go trusting that Jesus created it for us, his followers, so that we would have something tangible to remind us of him, his life, his sacrifice. How thoughtful and wise. So, I take Jesus up on what he offers--humbly--remembering as best I can his great love and sacrifice and somehow expect that this practice will help me follow him better. I do wish, though, our tradition gave us more leeway to interact with one another as we "commune." It seems more Upper Room-ish.

Mon, May 19, 2008 @ 10:22 PM

2. Da Sciple wrote:
I could'nt help be struck by the same line Ken snuck in toward the end of the message. How sad and true it is that we have fallen so far off course from the unity our Lord came to give us. I'm a usual noon servicer, this weekend my wife and i had a lil gettting away time and were able to make the 10:30 service [no kids:)]. Hearing Ken's simplifying yet "meaty" sermon was a true blessing. I pray that not only according to the doctrine(s) of communion but all of our errant Pharasaic ways, we would ask ourselves WDJD instead of WWJD. What would?!... leaves my sinful nature and ever complicating thought process too much room to formulate it's own ideas. What did?!... keeps me looking to The Word (who became flesh) and exegetically drawing from actuals and not possibilities.

Grace & Peace

Wed, May 21, 2008 @ 10:09 AM

3. Almita wrote:
I must be a little naive but I have never been aware of controvery regarding communion. I knew that my catholic friends regarded the elements as the actual body and blood of Christ - but that didn't mean much to me when I was young because it was still all about Jesus. As a child, I was always curious as to why my mom would always have tears in her eyes during the communion service. When I grew up in my relationship with Jesus, I understood that those tears were ones of thanksgiving for His sacrifice. I have always taken the words of Jesus, "to do this in remembrance of me," to be what partaking of communion should mean - and that is just what it means to me. No matter what the sermon is about on that particular day, just remembering the sacrifice and love that our Savior demonstrated on my behalf, and the hope that I have because of Him, fills my heart with an appreciation and awareness of my responsibility to always serve Him with joy and abandonment and love.

I was in the Noon service and did not hear Ken's sermon, but Felix did a good job of reminding us that the communion table should remind us of Christ's last supper with His disciples and our obligation to serve as He served.

Wed, May 21, 2008 @ 4:56 PM

4. Alecia Streelman wrote:
For me,the disconcerting thing about Jesus is his consistency--there is never a disconnect between thought, word and action--so Jesus' "doctrine" always matched his practice, and both doctrine and practice were always perfectly balanced. He didn't skimp on correcting wrong thinking, but at the same time he insisted on practical implementation of truth learned. We sinners, on the other hand, have this uncanny ability to think/say one thing and do another or become too heavily weighted on one side. So the love feast of communion, designed to bring people together in worship and remembrance of their shared faith and forgiveness often divides along squiggly lines of wafers or bread, wine or juice, challis or cup, who, where, when, how often, whether the elements actually become or represent the body and blood. How loving of us. Jesus summed up his doctrine pretty simply: love God and love others. Everything he did and said was consistent with that statement. Seems like a pretty good example to follow --for communion and everything else about living Christianly.

Fri, May 23, 2008 @ 7:10 AM

5. Da Sciple wrote:
Amen Alecia!

Love Test anyone? This is a good one...

http://www.wayofthemaster.com/lovetest.shtml

Fri, May 23, 2008 @ 11:07 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.